Plex has announced a massive price increase on the service’s Lifetime Plex Pass. On July 1, the lifetime subscription option will go from $249.99 to $749.99, an increase of 200%. The price hike will only apply to new subscribers, with no changes to monthly or annual subscription pricing.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And Plex doesn’t require any. It’s okay to accept that one product can be more polished than the other, and Plex has a lot of stuff that “just works”

      • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        59 minutes ago

        My comment wasn’t for you then, it’s for people curious in an alternative but may be hesitant. Some people enjoy learning new things.

  • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    The Jellyfin vs Plex thing always struck me as odd. As in - why are we holding JF to a different standard to (say) Immich, Syncthing, Pi-hole or any one of a thousand different programs people self host?

    Yes, JF ships multi-user accounts and client apps etc. I get it, “multi-use” is implied, so the comparison isn’t totally unfair. But there’s a difference between ‘this feature exists’ and ‘this is the primary purpose of the tool’.

    The fact that you CAN share it externally doesn’t mean everyone running JF is doing that, or that it should be the benchmark the whole project is judged by.

    To me, self host means “I host it, myself” not “I host it and then pretend to be Netflix for family and friends”. If that’s the use case, then of course, Plex away.

    It’s cool that you CAN share JF externally, and it’s cool that Plex does that differently / better. We shouldn’t hold one to the standards of the other.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I “defend” plex against silly complaints, but jesus christ that is one giant leap for no gain. That’s stupid, no one will pay that - though I tend to think that’s the whole point.

  • db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I got this on Black Friday many years ago for ~70 and despite the pass I am slowly moving over to Jellyfin. I really don’t see how they came up with this valuation, seems like a last money squeeze before abandoning ship.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just out of interest as someone who has recently set up a Jellyfin server - what’s the main “value add” of using Plex compared to Jellyfin?

    It seems to do everything I want, so I’m not sure why people would pay for Plex over the FOSS version.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Realistically the only advantage of Plex is being able to watch it over the internet without a VPN. Which means it makes it easier to get friends and family access to your server or to access it yourself from random smart tvs outside your house.

      If you only watch at home or have a fire stick that you take with you to watch abroad or your friends/family members have one and can setup a VPN on it it’s not needed.

    • hedders@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For me, the killer app for Plex is Plexamp, the music client. It’s superb, and AFAIK Jellyfin doesn’t really have an equivalent (there are 3P options, but they’re lacking).

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For me (Android) I have used these:

        • Finamp
        • Default Jellyfin App
        • Symfonium

        And Symfonium can do many sources and is the moat powerful.
        Finamp is neat but couldnt do casting to my soundbar via google cast

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ease of use, and actual secure and usable external access.

      Friends/family make an account and tell you their account name or email address, you invite them to your library and that’s it, they can watch/listen to your media on pretty much any device they have. No vpn needed.

      Jellyfin is not meant to be exposed to the internet for remote viewing. It also doesn’t have a client on most devices people use to watch tv/movies.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Huge disagree on the last part. Jellyfin has a bunch of Android, Roku, Google tv and PC clients. I struggle to think of a device me or my friends use that has a Plex client but not a Jellyfin one.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve got a bunch of friends accessing my jellyfin server. It has clients for most devices now.

    • spizzat2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Are you accessing your media from outside of your network?

      I have heard that you need to set up a VPN for Jellyfin to securely use your media library remotely. Plex handles all of that for me so that I don’t need to deal with it.

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I do not, and don’t plan to. Probably wouldn’t be that hard to set up though as someone familiar with nginx.

        I guess Plex uses their own VPN under the hood then to make it more convenient?

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yep, and it generally has fewer sharp corners. Like last time I checked, in order to set up quick sync, you have to manually check each codec you want to offload to hardware. And if you select one that isn’t supported by your hardware, you find out when you try to play that. So it means carefully cross-referencing with the Wikipedia page for your quick sync version. Plex just has an enable hardware transcoding check box and it figures it out for you.

          There’s also some features like smart playlists that I remember needing to set up plugins for whereas Plex supports it out of the box.

          Of course ther are other things where jellyfin comes out ahead, like surround to stereo down mixing - I could never get the center channel (dialog) to be at a good volume when down mixed to stereo on my TV, but it just works and produces the correct volume in jellyfin.

          But ultimately I think what causes all my users to prefer Plex is that the official app is polished and consistent across all platforms. The official jellyfin one looks like a programmer put it together with bootstrap components, and my favorite alternatives (like findroid) are in active development (I do donate on a reoccurring basis though in hopes that it reaches a level of polish matching Plex)

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I don’t think transcoding is that difficult if you’ve already set up your own server. Like, that’s only a thing the admin would have to figure out and it’s a quick lookup.

            I do agree with the client UI issue tho, and would like to add that the lack of a per-user watchlist is a pretty baffling decision given that it’s been widely requested for years and years and it would make it enormously more comfortable.

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As someone who picked up lifetime for like $45 or whatever it was (I think a 50% off sale?) what must have been 15 years ago…

      I run jellyfin. Its just a better experience IMO.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m sorry but you can hate Plex and prefer jellyfin all you want, but you don’t have to lie. Nothing about jellyfin is a “better experience” than Plex.

        What are some examples?

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Don’t have to make an account, for starters. Gives you more detailed control of transcoding options, audio playback and whatnot.

          The UI is worse, that much is true, but that’s not the end all be all of user experience.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If you ignore the mostly horrendous UI, the security problems, the worse transcoding performance, the harder setup, the difficulty to access it remotely in a safe way,… Yeah sure, way better

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If you use it weekly it shouldn’t be free to you, certainly if you use it more frequently than that. Give money to the projects you depend on or they will disappear.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Supporting software that you use by paying for it?

          Ew.

          /kidding

          I’m a very happy lifetime membership owner and have zero problem with them removing features from the free version. Free doesn’t pay the bills unless you want to become the product.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve gotten my money’s worth out of the $74.99 I paid for Plex Pass Lifetime several years ago. If they ever get rid of my Plex Pass and try to say “Lifetime didn’t actually mean Lifetime”, I’ll be gone.

    • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I like to think I got my money out of mine as well, even though I only used it for like a year or two before switching to jellyfin.

  • iamthetot@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I know that whales exist, but seriously… Who is into self hosting but also into dropping $750 on a service that can end on a whim?

  • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So basically, they just want to phase our the lifetime plan, but they know removing it outright would cause outrage so they “just” increase the price to massively lower interest and then say: “Well nobody wanted it so we removed the product”.

    I swear to god plex and the profiteering sons of bitches behind it can go fuck themselves.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The make more off of FAAS then lifetime sub’s. More of their users are FAAS users them stream your own.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The company’s blog post also described a number of improvements they plan to make

    After you pay: “oops, we won’t”

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 hours ago

      From a purely profit-oriented perspective, no. They’re setting up a pretext to eliminate the lifetime license plan due to a lack of interest. No sane person would pay that kind of lump sum for the service (and the insane ones will bring in triple the revenue), so they’ll claim that there is no market for it. After that, they’re free to crank up the periodic subscription prices.

      Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by profiteering opportunism.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by profiteering opportunism.

        Does this already have a name? If not, can we call it “Riccitiello’s Law”?

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not really. Their plan for a while now is to convert all to subscriptions and this is just their latest salvo. Next up is getting rid of it completely due to “no demand” and then kicking existing lifetime accounts to some static version that won’t be supported.